|Overall Quality of the Proposal
||The proposal itself was thorough and provided enough insight into the proposed session.|
||The submitter has described experience planning educational programs.
The submitter is an EXPERT in the topic and well connected with other experts.
||The topic is practical - meaning there will be knowledge, skills, or information that can be applied right away.
The topic will have an impact directly on improving patient care.
This is a hot topic, cutting edge or a fresh perspective. If not, do you think there will still be significant interest in the session?
Session Activity Elements
|Relevant practice gaps are described.
At least two sources to support the current need for this activity are included and described.
||The proposed faculty are well known experts.
The proposed faculty are experienced presenters.
|Session Activity Elements||Learning objectives make sense based upon the topic and intended audience.
An active learning strategy to engage the audience in the content is included for each objective.
A method of learning assessment (examples: participant feedback, case discussion, answers given) is included for each objective to allow participants to assess their own mastery of content and their learning.