HRT Ups Breast Cancer, Cardiovascular Risks
Study participants were told in June to stop taking their medication after a planned safety analysis revealed that long-term use of the therapy increased by 26 percent a woman's chance of having invasive breast cancer. Compared with placebo users, women treated with the hormone replacement regimen also were 41 percent more likely to have a stroke and 29 percent more likely to have a myocardial infarction.
Previous epidemiologic and casecontrol studies had suggested that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) reduces a womans' risk of cardiovascular disease. The current prospective study, which was sponsored by NIH's National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and involved some 16,600 women, was conducted to determine whether HRT offers cardiovascular benefits to postmenopausal women with no history of heart disease.
The study results are scheduled for publication in the July 17 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) but were released online yesterday because of the report's clinical significance.
In an editorial that was also released yesterday by JAMA, two Harvard researchers described the study results as "unexpected and disquieting."
According to the editorialists, "the whole purpose of healthy women taking long-term estrogen/progestin therapy is to preserve health and prevent disease. The results of this study provide strong evidence that the opposite is happening."
Guidelines released last year by NHLBI indicated that estrogen-and-progestin combination therapy offers no cardiovascular benefit for postmenopausal women who have heart disease. The guidelines also noted that postmenopausal women with heart disease who take long-term HRT may increase their risk of breast cancer, thromboembolism, and gall bladder disease.
In the current study, safety analyses conducted during the past two years had linked estrogen-and-progestin combination therapy with a slight increase in users' risk for cardiovascular events. But the combined risks of the therapy did not reach statistical significance until the breast-cancer link was found.
Women who participated in the study were between 50 and 79 years of age at enrollment and had an intact uterus. Each woman was randomly assigned to receive either a placebo or a single tablet containing 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens and 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate daily for at least three years. The placebo and HRT tablets were identical in appearance, and neither the study participants nor the clinical staff at the 40 study sites knew which tablets contained estrogen and progestin.
The study participants were contacted for follow-up information every six months during the trial, and they also visited a study site once each year. On average, the researchers collected 5.2 years of follow-up data for each woman in the study. At the time the study was halted, data were available for 8,199 women in the HRT group and 7,826 women who had been assigned to the placebo group.
The hormone replacement regimen offered some health benefits along with the risks. Women who used the combination therapy were 33 percent less likely than placebo users to have a hip fracture and 37 percent less likely to have colorectal cancer during the study.
Despite these findings, NHLBI Director Claude Lenfant declared in a statement that "[t]he cardiovascular and cancer risks of estrogen plus progestin outweigh any benefits."
The current product labeling for Prempro, the estrogenprogestin tablet used in the study, states that the product is indicated for the treatment of menopausal symptoms and vaginal atrophy and the prevention of osteoporosis. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, manufacturer of Prempro, noted yesterday in a press release that HRT remains critical for the treatment of menopausal symptoms.
But Jacques Rossouw, acting director of NHLBI's Women's Health Initiative (WHI), which orchestrated the study, said in a statement that all women who use HRT need to consider the study's results.
"Women with a uterus who are currently taking estrogen plus progesterone should have a serious talk with their doctor to see if they should continue it," Rossouw said. "If they are taking this hormone combination for short-term relief of symptoms, it may be reasonable to continue since the benefits are likely to outweigh the risks. Longer term use or use for disease prevention must be re-evaluated given the multiple adverse effects noted in WHI."
NHLBI confirmed in a statement that the current findings do not affect an ongoing WHI study on the effects of estrogen monotherapy in women who have had a hysterectomy. "At this point," NHLBI noted, "the balance of risks and benefits of estrogen alone is still uncertain."