Physicians, Public Not Overly Concerned About Medical Errors
A recent survey of 831 practicing physicians and 1207 members of the public found that 5% of physicians and 6% of the public view medical errors as one of the nations most important health issues.1 Of note, 35% of the physicians and 42% of the nonphysician respondents said that they or a family member had been a victim of a medical error at some time.
Of the physicians surveyed, 29% said that the costs associated with malpractice insurance and lawsuits are the most pressing current national health issue; 27% named the cost of health care as the most important national health issue. Coming in third, cited by 22% of the physician respondents, were problems with insurance companies and health plans.
Members of the public were likewise more concerned about the costs of care than with medical errors. Of public respondents, 38% said that the cost of medical care is the most important health issue they face today, and 31% were concerned about the high cost of prescription drugs.
When asked to choose from a list the number that best estimates how many patients die each year from preventable medical errors, most physicians and patients selected either 5,000 or 50,000 patient deaths. Just 9% of physicians and 7% of the public estimated that 100,000 medical errors result in death each year, a figure that approximates the annual number of deadly errors cited in a landmark report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM).2
According to the recent survey, described in the New England Journal of Medicine, at least half of the physicians and 65% or more of the public respondents believed that understaffing of nurses and overwork, stress, or fatigue of health care professionals are important causes of medical errors.
Seventy-two percent of the public, but 37% of physicians, said that a major cause of errors is the fact that physicians do not have enough time to spend with patients. The failure of health care professionals to work together as a team was cited as a critical cause of errors by 67% of the public and 39% of physicians.
The public and physicians differed in what they considered to be effective ways to reduce medical errors. Forty percent of the public and half as many physicians said that including pharmacists on hospital rounds is a very effective way to reduce medical errors.
Most of the responding physicians indicated that two error-reduction remedies can be very effectiveincreasing the number of nurses who work in hospitals and requiring hospitals to develop systems that prevent medical errors.
While public respondents endorsed these two remedies, at least half also indicated that additional workplace strategies, such as giving physicians more time to spend with patients, improving the training of health care professionals, relying exclusively on intensivists to direct treatment in intensive care units, and reducing physicians work hours to prevent fatigue, can be very effective at reducing medical errors.
Physicians and the public also diverged sharply in their views of the effectiveness of error reporting to reduce medical mishaps. Seventy-one percent of the public and 23% of the physicians strongly supported requiring hospitals to report all serious medical errors to a state agency. Sixty-two percent of the public and 21% of physicians said that encouraging voluntary state-operated error-reporting systems can be very effective methods to reduce errors.
Perhaps not surprisingly, 3% of physicians and half of public respondents said that suspending the licenses of health care professionals who make errors is an effective way to improve safety. The reports authors noted that the publics strong support of punishing individuals for medical errors directly contradicts IOMs view that errors should be regarded as institutional systems failures, not personal failures.
The reports authors, whose work was supported by the Kaiser Family Foundation, concluded that national groups committed to error reduction must make an effort to promote, especially to physicians, the idea that current strategies designed to reduce medical errors can be very effective.
- Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Brodie M et al. Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1933-40.
- Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
Advancing Your Practice
Advancing Your Career and Practice
- My ASHP
- About ASHP
- Membership Center
- News and Media
- CEO Blog
- House of Delegates
- State Affiliates
- Products and Services
- Contact Us
Bethesda, MD 20814
- Ambulatory Care
- ASHP Forecasts
- Career Transitions
- Clinical Guidelines
- Clinician Well-Being and Resilience
- Controlled Substances Management
- Credentialing and Privileging
- Current Shortages
- Drug Supply Chain
- Emergency Care
- Emergency Preparedness
- Emerging Sciences
- Learn More
- Home Infusion
- Inpatient Care
- Investigational Drug Services
- Medications and Suicidality
- Opioid Management
- Pain Management Toolkit
- Patient Safety
- Pharmaceutical Waste
- Practice Management
- Preceptor Toolkit
- Provider Status Readiness
- Public Relations
- Quality Improvement
- Small and Rural Hospital
- Specialty Pharmacy
- Sterile Compounding
- Transitions of Care
Professional Certificate Programs
Technician Program Accreditation
- Pharmacy Technician Training Program Directory
- ASHP/ACPE Pharmacy Technician Accreditation Commission
- Accreditation Standards, Regulations, and Other Tools
- Starting a Pharmacy Technician Training Program
- Sample Forms
- Applying for Accreditation
- Preparing for an Accreditation Survey
- Other Professional Organizations
- Pharmacy Technician TABLET Newsletter
- The Value of ASHP/ACPE Accreditation for Pharmacy Technician Training Programs
- ASHP/ACPE Pharmacy Technician Program Accreditation Logos
- Complaints Procedure